Pular para o conteúdo
Wildiney Di Masi
Articles

March 9, 2026

Low Unemployment, Broken Market. Why the Numbers Do Not Match Reality

Unemployment is low, but LinkedIn tells a different story. The problem is not the economy — it is the metric. Macro indicators are not lying. They are just looking in the wrong place.

mercado de trabalho desemprego layoffs salários tecnologia inteligência artificial métricas

Statistics say unemployment is low. LinkedIn says something else.

Mass layoffs, experienced professionals out of the market for months, falling salaries, no entry points for juniors, and no negotiating power for seniors. The two pictures seem incompatible. They are not.

The problem is not the economy. It is the metric.

The unemployment rate measures only people without work who are actively searching. It ignores underemployment, informality, precarious conditions, and highly qualified people working well below their level. Brazil's own IBGE treats this as workforce underutilization — a number significantly larger than the unemployment rate alone.

The labor market is also not homogeneous.

While lower-wage sectors continue hiring, the qualified labor market is going through a deep restructuring. Public data from layoffs.fyi shows recurring waves of tech layoffs since 2022, driven by extreme efficiency, salary globalization, and AI-powered automation.

A name has already been given to this phenomenon: the K-shaped market.

One part of the workforce improves (the ascending arm), another deteriorates (the descending arm). The shape divides. The average looks stable, but individual trajectories move apart.

Employment grows. Wages shrink. Stability disappears. Time to find a new position increases.

Salary data platforms like Glassdoor show stagnation or real decline in areas like product, design, and technology, especially outside the top of the pyramid.

When someone says "I know a lot of people who are unemployed" or "earning less," that is not collective hysteria. It is a specific slice of the picture.

Macro indicators are not exactly lying. They are just looking in the wrong place.

For people working in product, design, and technology, insisting on reading only those metrics is like trying to understand the future by looking in the rearview mirror.

That said, the intent here is not pessimism or alarm. It is understanding and accepting reality: it is not just your competence or qualifications that are at stake. There is a market being reshaped in pursuit of better cost-efficiency.

When the supply of qualified professionals exceeds demand, the hiring process stops being human, artisanal, or meritocratic. It becomes mass-scale, automated, and statistical.

Resumes written by AI, for positions written by AI, selected by AI.

Almost like a poker game, where whoever bluffs better stays at the table.